<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tata Nano Car – An Unviable Business Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/</link>
	<description>Down To Earth Solutions To Your Business Problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:34:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laundry Bag %0B</title>
		<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Laundry Bag %0B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/?p=205#comment-131</guid>
		<description>there are many social issues these days and we have different solutions for different social problems &quot;,&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are many social issues these days and we have different solutions for different social problems &#8220;,&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/?p=205#comment-129</guid>
		<description>&quot;A recent press report says that it has been claimed that the amount of subsidy works out to Rs 60,000 per car, which is as high as 60% of its retail selling price.&quot;

I&#039;ve done some research about this 60% claim but i haven&#039;t found any reliable source to confirm this. So therefore i&#039;m thinking that what you&#039;re saying is not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A recent press report says that it has been claimed that the amount of subsidy works out to Rs 60,000 per car, which is as high as 60% of its retail selling price.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done some research about this 60% claim but i haven&#8217;t found any reliable source to confirm this. So therefore i&#8217;m thinking that what you&#8217;re saying is not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jocelyn Peterson</title>
		<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyn Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/?p=205#comment-128</guid>
		<description>there are many social issues today that bothers us, hope we can solve everyone of them&#039;*`</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are many social issues today that bothers us, hope we can solve everyone of them&#8217;*`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter Ward</title>
		<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/?p=205#comment-126</guid>
		<description>there are lots of social issues that we face these days due to hardships and disease.:-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are lots of social issues that we face these days due to hardships and disease.:-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utpalendu Gupta</title>
		<link>http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/2009/02/25/management/tata-nano-car-unviable-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Utpalendu Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smebusinesssolutions.co.in/?p=205#comment-44</guid>
		<description>The merits of the arguments presented in the blog are undeniable. On the environmental issue, however, I&#039;d be reluctant to point a finger at anyone (despite the big-profile visibility of the Tatas as an easy target) without first pointing it at myself.

Most green versus un-green debates are ultimately social issues, and thus political issues too. The ferocious and often violent arguments traded over Singur were never about &quot;No-no to Nano&quot;. All parties there were pro-Nano, but differed only over the mode of land acquisition. Since the un-greenliness of Nano did not enter or inform our collective awareness, it may be unfair to demand of the Tatas as a mere profit-seeking industrialist group a higher level of green-consciousness than the rest of society.

The social context of the environmnetal debate is deeper than may be immediately perceived. Granted the nano-car is hostile to the environment, is the mid-sized or the larger car any better? Are we, as members of the society&#039;s elite and privileged class, willing to first give up our BMW and Mercedes and Tata-Sumo before we talk of the Nano?

As Sukumar Ray might have said:
aamraa jaabo mercedes&#039;e, choRbo shadaa plane&#039;e -
tomraa jete chaaile pare bolbo &quot;kalaa ei ne&quot;..

How about motor-cycles and scooters? Do we wish to eliminate them too? If not, it may well be argued that the Nano is no more than a four-wheeled motor-cycle and should therefore be allowed to co-exist with the two-wheeled variety.

Technology has given us a lot of benefits over the last couple of centuries; unfortunately, it has also ended the holocene epoch and brought about the anthropocene era where man&#039;s inventions have a profound impact on the global eco-system. We need a serious debate at the civic society level about these concerns - a debate which may be pioneered by, for example, the IIT&#039;s and/or the IIM&#039;s which may also fund much-needed research. Once some form of consensus begins to evolve about how to balance material and social progress against consequential environmental damage, it may then be possible to involve wider groups like political parties, chambers of commerce and industry, etc., and look towards specific action.

To expect the Tatas to enter the debate before it has even commnenced may not be fair to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The merits of the arguments presented in the blog are undeniable. On the environmental issue, however, I&#8217;d be reluctant to point a finger at anyone (despite the big-profile visibility of the Tatas as an easy target) without first pointing it at myself.</p>
<p>Most green versus un-green debates are ultimately social issues, and thus political issues too. The ferocious and often violent arguments traded over Singur were never about &#8220;No-no to Nano&#8221;. All parties there were pro-Nano, but differed only over the mode of land acquisition. Since the un-greenliness of Nano did not enter or inform our collective awareness, it may be unfair to demand of the Tatas as a mere profit-seeking industrialist group a higher level of green-consciousness than the rest of society.</p>
<p>The social context of the environmnetal debate is deeper than may be immediately perceived. Granted the nano-car is hostile to the environment, is the mid-sized or the larger car any better? Are we, as members of the society&#8217;s elite and privileged class, willing to first give up our BMW and Mercedes and Tata-Sumo before we talk of the Nano?</p>
<p>As Sukumar Ray might have said:<br />
aamraa jaabo mercedes&#8217;e, choRbo shadaa plane&#8217;e -<br />
tomraa jete chaaile pare bolbo &#8220;kalaa ei ne&#8221;..</p>
<p>How about motor-cycles and scooters? Do we wish to eliminate them too? If not, it may well be argued that the Nano is no more than a four-wheeled motor-cycle and should therefore be allowed to co-exist with the two-wheeled variety.</p>
<p>Technology has given us a lot of benefits over the last couple of centuries; unfortunately, it has also ended the holocene epoch and brought about the anthropocene era where man&#8217;s inventions have a profound impact on the global eco-system. We need a serious debate at the civic society level about these concerns &#8211; a debate which may be pioneered by, for example, the IIT&#8217;s and/or the IIM&#8217;s which may also fund much-needed research. Once some form of consensus begins to evolve about how to balance material and social progress against consequential environmental damage, it may then be possible to involve wider groups like political parties, chambers of commerce and industry, etc., and look towards specific action.</p>
<p>To expect the Tatas to enter the debate before it has even commnenced may not be fair to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

